I need to make known that I wasn't an outsider sticking my nose into somebody else's business. On two levels (maybe more) I was being asked to be a part of the live-together now, marry later arrangement. I remember swallowing hard just before I said, "I have a problem with that."
After I turned on the flashing red light in the room, I gave the couple an opportunity to end the conversation. I know that the fact that I have a problem does not necessarily mean that I have a right to impose my standard on others. The couple said little, but their eyes, and more the fact that they stayed seated, said, "Go on." It's not a time for a complicated, long-winded, hard to follow tirade. I used a one-verse observation to, as my friend said, "Speak the truth in love."
There is nothing complex here, but it might be something that will help others who desire to lovingly speak the truth about a difficult problem in our culture.
Marriage is to be held in honor among all, and the marriage bed is to be undefiled; for fornicators and adulterers God will judge." (Hebrews 13:4)
Use the semicolon in the verse above as the dividing line. Before the semicolon the verse is marked by honor. God says that what is going on here is to be held in honor. Whatever is going on after the semicolon is something that makes one subject to God's judgment--hardly honorable. The mention of the "marriage bed" is a tip-off. If one were to make a video of what is going on in the marriage bed--something I very much don't recommend) and if a video were made of the activity that is described as fornication and adultery, the content of the videos would be identical. So here the very same activity that in the front end of the verse is honorable, in the back end of the verse places one in the uncomfortable position of being the subject of God's judgment.
"So," I asked my friends, "what makes the difference between the two ends of the verse? What has changed?"
The obvious answer is marriage. At the beginning of the verse a married couple is being contemplated. At the end a couple who are unwed.
Generally this scriptural observation/exhortation doesn't have the positive result that it had on this day. I've been told that such matters are none of my business. Frequently, I'm met with a look incredulity, that eloquently says something like, "I can't believe that you believe (or "still believe") that."
I do believe it. Further I don't believe it is just an arbitrary standard that God sent down from on high. The sexual standard of the Bible is really rather simple. Sex is to take place only between a man and a woman who are married to one another. God gave us this standard because it is in line with the way that He made us. Adhering to this standard leads to the greatest possible human flourishing. Allowing it to erode does no one any favors, and for those of us who are given the responsibility to speak for the Lord, to fail to uphold this standard is sinful.
Here is where I have problem with some of my colleagues. For too many of my fellow-pastors, this is the elephant that fills the room yet is politely ignored. I'm asking you to acknowledge pachyderm. It is tough, very tough, but I am convinced that if we are going to maintain our integrity we have to deal with it.
I appreciate the position that some pastors I know have taken:
- The pastor of mega-church in California says, "If I am going to work with you in doing this wedding you need to enter into this commitment of purity. I'm not going to judge you about the past, but I need for your to commit to a standard of purity (chastity) from this point until your marriage.
- When confronted with the usual "problem," "We can't get married now, we have to book a DJ, buy a dress, schedule a venue, etc. etc. etc." Sometimes complicated by the claim that we can't afford to live apart." Leaving aside for a moment the fact that a family of six could live for a year on all they money they are proposing to spend on the big wedding, my friend offers the couple two alternatives: Somebody needs to move out, or our church will help you put together a wedding. It has to take place within two weeks. (To those who would say that one more night is no different than another year, I would say, "There is a difference. My friend is pushing the couple a commitment to do what is right, rather than what looks fabulous.")
- Another uses a questionnaire to begin a conversation about the couple really wants. If what they really, really want is to do as they jolly well please in spite of what the Word of God says, what business do we as "Men of God" have in being involved?
Guys, we can help one another here. If a couple says, in essence, "We really don't think that what the Bible says about marriage has anything to do with us." Why should we be involved. I tell couples, "I'm not in the marrying business. I am, however, glad to help people build Biblical homes. If we are going to do that, we need to start right now.
I'd love to hear from you. I think a discussion--even an argument--could be helpful.
Here is a god article about speaking the truth in an understanding, compassionate way: http://www.churchleaders.com/pastors/pastor-articles/169778-stephen-altrogge-westboro-baptist-and-rob-bell.html?p=2